
P.O. Box 15102 SF CA 94115 (415) 863-6397 fax (415) 431-2021
email editor@sfobserver.com
• advertising info
|
Departments Home SF Observer Castro Star Haight-Ashbury Beat Western Edtion Art Books Calendar Cinema Comics Food Music Opinon/Letters Sports Theatre Archives Columns Fix it Dammit Neighborhood Fix Its Crime Log Mayor Gavin Newsom Supe. Bevan Dufty Cong. Nancy Pelosi Tax Matters by Kathy Stephenson Beyond the Windshield by Ken Grosserode Real Estate Corner by Danita Kulp Your Library Branch Pet of the Month by SFSPCA Where to Find SF Observer Publications AD RATES We have Special Rates for Local Merchants! Please inquire! Published by Third Eye Media Charles Hack Sandy Staggs Pedro Tuyub
|
Election Watch '03 SF OBSERVER ENDORSES:
YES on Prop. G -- Rainy Day Fund
YES on Prop. H -- Police Commission Reform
YES on Prop. I -- Child Care for Low
Income Families
NONE on Prop. J -- Facilities for the
Homeless
YES on Prop. K -- Sales Tax for Transportation
YES on Prop. L -- Minimum Wage
NO on Prop. M -- Aggressive Solicitation
Ban
NONE on Prop. N -- Taxi Permit Holder
Disability
BY PAUL KOZAKIEWICZ The major candidates vying for Mayor Willie Brown's job faced members of the City's neighborhood press at City Hall Sept. 15 to explain their positions on quality-of-life issues facing San Francisco's neighborhoods.
Gavin
Newsom described himself as being left, politically,
of presidential candidate Howard Dean because he is an ardent supporter
of rent control and other liberal issues. But his positions concerning
the homeless, especially his homeless measure Care Not Cash, has
led to him being vilified by tenant activists as an insensitive
millionaire son of privilege, an image he said is often perpetuated
by San Francisco media. Angela Alioto says there is a lot of fat in the city's $5 billion budget, and she opposes the rampant use of tax dollars in single-source, non-competitive-bidding contracts.
She also thinks the amount of city money going to Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) is "a scandal." Although the city's goal of awarding contracts to minority- and women-owned businesses is 16 percent, she said, the actual rate is now down to about 3 percent.When she served on the SF Board of Supervisors in the 1990s, the rate was 11 percent. To stimulate the economy, Alioto would look to cut waste from the budget. The trial attorney would also eliminate the city's payroll tax, and institute an across-the-board tax for all businesses, closing loopholes that she says allow large corporations to escape paying their fair share of taxes. The payroll tax penalizes employers who hire additional employees, she said, resulting in fewer positions. To tackle homelessness, Alioto has a 25-page plan that calls for 1,500 volunteers fanning out across the city in search of the homeless population. Once located, the volunteers would direct the homeless to one of the 400 organizations the city pays each year to deliver services to the population. She calls the job "a mission, not an obligation." Tom Ammiano said he dislikes the traditional budget cycle, whereby the mayor introduces a budget and gives the supervisors precious little time to work with city residents to fashion the best possible budget.
So he has worked to open up the negotiations with neighborhood groups and nonprofit providers, and took budget meeting out to the neighborhoods for direct public feedback. He also started working on budget issues all year long rather than wait until the mayor introduced a budget. Ammiano said he would diversify the city's business landscape by working more to secure biotech and other emerging-technology firms. To balance the city budget, he wants to make government more efficient. He said that small businesses are an unrecognized economic engine that should be helped, perhaps with small business loans. But he also says that many large businesses don't pay their fair share of taxes. Ammiano vowed that his administration would work hard to improve schools and increase funding to improve educational opportunities, particularly on the east side of the city where test scores are the lowest. Concerning the homeless population, Ammiano said a major effort needs to be facilitated to reach and treat mentally ill people. He also thinks the city is badly managing the homeless program, and that there is some fraud that needs to be rooted out. The current approach of leasing out an entire building that it can be used to house homeless and provide services at the same location is a sound one, he said.
Matt Gonzalez called economic development the most important issue in the race, because it provides the money government needs to function. He would diversify the city's business base and eliminate the city's payroll tax because it penalizes employers who want to hire additional employees. He would also shrink the size of government by lowering the city's payroll through attrition. Many department heads do not replace employees lost to retirement or other reasons, because the money that would have been used to pay for the employee's salary and benefits can be diverted to other department purposes without the department heads having to go to the supervisors for a supplemental appropriation. "There's a game going on," he said. The supervisor would also like to see residential developers contribute to a fund to improve city resources in exchange for permission to develop a property. Currently, only commercial developers contribute to a separate fund. Gonzalez, a member of the Green Party, also refuted the idea that the party was politically to the left of the Democratic Party. He said the Greens are a unique third party in American politics that favors decentralized government and encompasses some of the values of both parties. Gonzalez does not favor Care Not Cash, saying a cut in cash payments might lower the numbers of people getting General Assistance checks, but that the city would pay more than it was saving through increased costs at hospital emergency rooms. He wants to improve the city's shelter system and build more transitional housing to house the homeless. Gonzalez would also like to help blue-collar workers stay in the city by exploring a public-private partnership, whereby the city would give money to homeowners for an equity stake in the property. When the property is sold, the city would get its money back plus a percentage of profits from the sale. Tony Ribera is going to tell the truth and face the consequences. As the only Republican in the mayor's race, he is undaunted in his battle to win election in an overwhelmingly Democratic city.
Ribera, the former chief of police under Mayor Frank Jordan who is currently the director of the Criminal Justice Management Program at the University of San Francisco, said the current situation in the city is reaching "crisis proportions" because of the administration of Mayor Willie Brown. He said Brown is appointing people based on a political patronage system, and that he is refusing to make difficult decisions, such as what to do to help the city's homeless population. "I'm not afraid to make hard decisions," Ribera said. He would cut a bureaucracy that has grown by several thousand people during Brown's administration. For example, Ribera said, when he was chief of police he had five civil service "exempt" positions that served at the will of the chief. Now, he said, there are 11 such positions. Ribera is opposed to higher taxes and wants to stimulate the business community, which he says has been neglected too long. He would reduce the size of government by 6 percent over four years by looking at the top of the management pyramid. Ribera is in favor of Care Not Cash, as well as treatment on demand for drug and alcohol abusers. He would appoint the city's director of human services to chair a committee that would look to improve the delivery of city services, particularly to the mentally ill homeless. "We have to reachut aggressively to those people," he said. Susan Leal has her eye on the city's money. As treasurer, Leal says she has stepped up the department's collection of delinquent debts and invested funds with some of the best returns of all California cities.
As mayor, she would use her financial expertise to grow the city's tax base and more efficiently run government programs. She would work to promote and retain business, providing capital through micro-enterprise loan. And she would eliminate the city's payroll tax. To help the homeless population, Leal favors reducing cash payments in favor of providing direct services, including housing. She would make the health department the lead agency in dealing with the situation and would meet weekly with all city departments working on the coordinated effort to assist the homeless. Leal thinks bond measures could be used to help finance housing for middle-class residents. A possibility would be to help homeowners by giving them a $40,000 grant to use as a down payment. Education is also a high priority for Leal. She would work to provide more preschools and after-school programs in the city and, where needed, provide transportation for students traveling to after-school programs. "Come hell or high water, we're going to contribute more money to schools," Leal said. The city's general election will be held on Tuesday, Nov. 4. No one is expected to get more than 50 percent of the vote on that date, requiring a run-off election that would be held on Dec. 9. The SF Neighborhood Newspaper Association is comprised of 16 neighborhood newspapers including the San Francisco Observer. Paul Kozakiewicz is the publisher of the Richmond Review and Sunset Beacon newspapers. BY RYAN LILLIS
SAN FRANCISCO -- Lost in the headline-grabbing
blur of the recall election, and overshadowed by the crowded race
for City Hall, is the three-person battle for the city's district
attorney.
At one end, you have the incumbent, touted
as progressive but criticized by opponents for his office's poor
conviction rate. Recent polls show that his main competition may
be in the form of a prosecutor-turned-defense attorney who is running
for the third time.
And then there's the Deputy City Attorney,
a first-time candidate heralded for her community outreach, but
whose campaign (over)spending caused controversy just weeks ago.
Add them up and it equals one interesting
race for San Francisco's top prosecutor. The election is Nov. 4.
Terence Hallinan
"The solution isn't to have a substantial amount
of the population put into prison, it's seeing that a substantial
amount of the population doesn't need to be in prison," said Robert
Henderson, Hallinan's campaign director.
According to the most recent statistics provided
by the California Department of Justice, Hallinan's conviction rate
for felony offenders has ranked last in the state every year since
he took office.
But Henderson said criticism of Hallinan's low
conviction rate is misguided. He noted that San Francisco's crime
rate went down 53 percent over Hallinan's first six years in office,
compared to a statewide decline of 37 percent. Violent crime decreased
by 60 percent in the city over that same time period, compared with
36 percent in the rest of the state.
Hallinan has taken "a different approach to crime,
it's more of a preventive approach," Henderson said. San Francisco
has the highest rate of cases being deferred to diversion programs
in the state, methods which have led to drastic declines in violent
crime, Henderson said.
"The objective, of course, is to prevent young
people from descending into a life of crime," Henderson said.
As for criticism that Hallinan's office has a weak
record of prosecuting domestic violence offenders, Henderson said
the district attorney has increased the number of prosecutors who
handle those cases from two to 12 over his tenure. Henderson said
that Hallinan's office often prosecutes even when a victim of domestic
violence voices their objection.
Bill Fazio
Some of the philosophies of this defense lawyer
and former prosecutor may be changing, however, as he said recently
that he would not support the death penalty in any case in San Francisco
and will support Proposition H, a police reform proposal on the
ballot.
In the past, Fazio has supported diversion programs
for drug offenders and the use of medical marijuana. He also, according
to published reports, said he would only use California's three-strikes
sentencing law in cases that involved violent felonies or persistent
felony offenders.
He is still considered more moderate than his opponents,
which, one political observer noted, may play to his advantage in
a year in which the leading contender for mayor (Sup. Gavin Newsom)
is not as far to the left as his three main competitors.
A recent poll commissioned by a downtown business
group had Fazio slightly ahead of Hallinan, with a large percentage
of voters still undecided.
Fazio worked in the district attorney's office
for 20 years, only to be fired in 1995 by Arlo Smith, whom Fazio
ran against. Fazio ended up losing to Hallinan that year and again
four years later. In the last election, Fazio lost by 1,820 votes.
Fazio, although bending more to the left, has said
he wants stronger prosecution of quality-of-life crimes.
A representative from Fazio's campaign did not
return phone messages seeking an interview with the candidate.
Kamala Harris
"There are so many diverse communities that are
impacted by the law enforcement community," Harris said. "We're
going to need to build coalitions. I have a track record that shows
I know how to do that."
Harris' coalitions reach from public and mental
health organizations, to the private sector, to civil rights committees.
She is a co-chair of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and
is on the board of the Child Abuse Prevention Council. She has been
vocal in trying to prevent teenage prostitution.
Harris criticized Hallinan for what she describes
as the sloppy handling of domestic violence cases. She said Hallinan
is "just not paying attention and it's absolutely unacceptable."
She also blasted Hallinan's low conviction rate,
saying "when the serious and violent crime is not prosecuted, the
most vulnerable people suffer: women, children, seniors, hate crime
victims, immigrants, the poor."
She said if elected, she would require prosecutors
to undergo more training and would design a more current tracking
system of offenders.
Harris' campaign hasn't gone without its own glitches.
Just weeks before the election, she was found to have exceeded the
city's campaign spending limit after promising not to. Harris later
said she had thought her campaign had been released from the restriction.
She admitted to making a mistake.
The city's Ethics Commission determined Harris
had unintentionally violated the spending cap and ordered her to
pay a fine.
Living Wage Initiative Set for November Ballot in SF BY MARIA SETIAWAN SAN FRANCISCO -- The San Francisco Department of Elections has approved a living wage initiative for the November ballot. On July 7, organizations supporting the initiative, including Young Workers Project, Minimum Wage Coalition and People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER) turned in 20,800 qualified signatures to the Department of Elections. If passed, the initiative will bring the hourly salary for San Francisco workers to $8.50, an increase of $1.75 from the current $6.75 California minimum. According to a study conducted by Michael Reich and Amy Laitinen of Institute for Labor and Employment at UC Berkeley, California minimum wage should currently be at $8.92, if adjusted for inflation. Thus, the present minimum wage has lost 24.3 percent of its real value since 1968. The study, which focused on the effects of minimum wage on the city's workers and businesses, came out last May and was commissioned by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. "We are setting some minimum standard," said Barry Hermanson, treasurer for Minimum Wage Coalition. He said the current minimum wage is inadequate, especially in a city with as high a cost of living as San Francisco. "People in some parts of the country can purchase less and less," he said, adding this creates problems for the industries. Nato Green of Young Workers Project said the increase would help young people, many of whom are college students. "(College students) have the option to go years and years through college, get student loans and get into debt or just drop out," he said, adding that young workers contribute to approximately 20 percent of the city's workforce. The combination of juggling schedules between school and work and escalating college tuition might push some students to drop out of college, Green said. Students attending California State University colleges, including San Francisco State University, will have to pay 30 percent more this fall. Green believes that raising the minimum wage is necessary in order for young people to aspire to a higher education. For Hermanson and Green, the raise is a small price to pay compared to the future benefits. "It would increase only a small amount of the operating cost," Green said. The $1.75 increase means an extra $280 per month for a full-time worker to spend. By putting purchasing power in the hands of consumer, "It would act as a stimulus to local economy," he said. Hermanson said the increase is a logical step to help low-income workers pay for their daily needs such as housing, childcare and health insurance. "It's important for people to be able to pay for what they need. We're not talking about extravagance," he said. But not everyone is convinced about the advantages of the initiative. The Golden Gate Restaurant Association (GGRA) and San Francisco Council of Business Merchants Association (SFCDMA) have voiced opposing arguments. In its July newsletter, SFCDMA stated that the minimum wage increase would put San Francisco businesses at competitive disadvantage compared with businesses across the city or county line. Both GGRA and SFCDMA argued that since the initiative doesn't count tips as part of the wage, it would increase tipped employees salary by 26 percent, according to GGRA's Web site. Considering the slumping economic conditions in the City and throughout the United States, the increase may be seen as having a detrimental effect that could contribute to further job losses. Based on previous pay raises in California, however, the study found no negative impact on employment. Despite the dissenting opinions, Hermanson and Green believe the initiative has a very good chance of passing in the upcoming election. "I believe this is an issue that will resonate very, very well in the community," Hermanson said. "I believe it's very realistic, and we are very moderate with our request." The study is available online at http://iir.Berkeley.edu/livingwage. Tom-a-Palooza
Takes no Prisoners By Eric Barnes
Bridget Schwartz took the current city administration to task for its relentless focus on making San Francisco attractive for tourists. "The rest of us have to live here!" she screamed, stomping a "Willie Brown hat" flat on the stage. She had tonsorial testiness to spare for Board of Supes President and mayoral candidate Matt Gonzalez, too. "Wash your hair, Matt!" she demanded. "I know it’s not easy being Green, but there are ecologically sensitive haircare products out there now."
|
|||||||||||